rubric.jpgg185.gif

RUBRIC 1

This rubric was created in collaboration with Elena


Aspects
Excellent (4 points)
Above Average
(3 points)

Satisfactory
(2 points)

Need Improvement
(1 point)


General Aspects






Is the purpose of the wiki is clear?






Do all pages contain a title?






Are the titles an appropriate size?






Does your photo appear
on the home page?






Is the wiki visually appealing?






Use of backgrounds, photos,
graphics, video, sounds.







Is the selection of text colours
appropriate / easy to read?







Organisation- Is the portfolio neatly organised?
Navigation - Is it easy to find information?







Do all the portfolio links function properly?
(broken links)






Is the audio and video used
relevant to the wiki’s subject?







Is the information reliable?






Is the use of language syntactically
and grammatically correct?







Do the pages require too much scrolling?






Is the data truly representative
of the student’s own work?







Are the resources and data
used saved on a hard disk?








Home Page





Is the home page attractive to the reader?
(title, colour, images)







Does the home page give a general
idea what the wiki is about?







Personal






Is there a title?






Is there background information?
(about site owner)







Is there a welcome
message for the visitor?







Is there a personal photo?







Wikis






Is there a definition of a wiki?






Is the explanation simple enough for
someone to understand what a wiki is?
(not too many technical terms)






Has research been undertaken
about the definition of a wiki?







Are the links of the websites visited cited?






Is the usage of photos and videos helpful
to understand the definition?









Digital Portfolio






Is there a definition of a digital portfolio?






Is the explanation simple enough for someone
to understand what a digital portfolio is?
(not too many technical terms)






Does the page show research about
the definition of a digital portfolio?







Are the links of the websites visited cited?






Is the usage of photos and videos helpful
enough to understand the definition?








Reflective Learning





Is it a reflection of what we have covered in class?






Does the page describe what you have done in
class and what you have learned from it?







Is there a progression of learning?





external image 01funny_face_4.jpg











RUBRIC 2

A rubric could have various different layouts than the previous one.

Avoiding negative language aspects is an issue that should be taken into

consideration. A rubric should not create any negative feelings to students as this

could discourage and dishearten them.

For example a rubric could have this layout:


--------------------Excellent 4------------------ Satisfactory 3------------------- Developing 2-------------- Beginning 1--------

Attractiveness

Colour, font, graphic and images selection are excellent. Content and layout are well organised. In general the Wiki presents an eye friendly environment.
Wiki colours and fonts selection are satisfactory.
Easy to read content.
Layout needs a little bit of improvement as text lines are often cut in the middle.
Wiki has a good selection of fonts, graphic and colours. However, the layout needs to be simplified in order to avoid distraction from less important elements of the wiki.
Wiki has a good selection of fonts,
graphic and colours but it frequently makes the content
difficult to read.


Content
Content well organised. Images, text, links and media are relevant to the topic. Student shows total comprehension of the topic. Sources used are acknowledged.
The page is organised well. Text, images and links used are relevant to the topic. Student shows comprehension of the subject.
Content needs to be more organised. Most of the context is relevant to the topic. Sources used are included.
Simple and limited content. Often irrelevant to the subject. Student does not show comprehension of the topic. More accuracy needed.


Language
No grammatical, misspelling or punctuation errors. Language is clear and precise. Excellent expressions and vocabulary. Outstanding use of language.
Grammatical and misspelling errors are rare. Language clarity improved a lot. No use of informal language.
A few grammatical and misspelling errors. Language lacks clarity.
Some grammatical and misspelling errors. Informal use of language.back_to_top_button.gif